Nuclear War Closer than ever, welcome to Common Era 2016

The theme of all of the scary movies of the Fifties [of the last Millennium, that is] is of a hidden, lethal danger that has been unleashed. Nuclear Power, don’t you know; about which there has been so little public-policy discussion.

It isn’t just us peaceniks who are raising questions about the Obama administration’s “modernization” plan. The growing list of opponents includes:

  • Andrew C. Weber, former assistant secretary of defense.
  • Philip E. Coyle III, former chief of nuclear weapons testing at the Pentagon.
  • Steve Fetter, former assistant director at-large of the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
  • William J. Perry, former defense secretary during the Clinton administration.

President Obama campaigned on a platform of reducing – and eventually ending – US dependence on nuclear arms as the linchpin of US defense policy. Yet what we have gotten is merely a quantitative reduction, with an accompanying qualitative ramping up of our nuclear strike force in terms of its sheer deadliness – and the likelihood of it being used.

The cost of the “modernization” program – which is even now racing through Congress with almost no opposition – is measured in the trillions of dollars. And the fact is that we don’t need this nuclear “triad” – a throwback to the dawn of the nuclear age, when intra-bureaucratic infighting between the three branches of the military resulted in nukes for all. Intercontinental ballistic missiles are a relic of the cold war era: a commission headed by Gen. Cartwright recommended scrapping them entirely. Bill Perry concurs. “We’re on the brink of a new arms race,” says Perry.

In short, the world is rapidly becoming a much more dangerous place. And it’s not because of ISIS, or the “terrorist threat” – it’s due to our policy of global intervention, which requires a “forward stance” that includes rattling the nuclear saber.

One can respond to the author of this survey, Justin Raimondo of The Military-Industrial Complex is at work, so what else is new.

Missing the opportunity offered to reduce to zero the nuclear armaments of the Non-Prolferation-Treaty nations of the world would be irrational, unless a new arms race serves certain purposes.

About M. Meo

Worked as translator, museum technician, truck lumper, lecture demonstrator, teacher (of English as a Second Language, science, math). Married for 25 years, 2 boys aged 18 & 16 (both on the Grant cross-country team). A couple of scholarly publications in the history of science. Two years in federal penitentiary, 1970/71, for refusing the draft.
This entry was posted in Afghanistan, Bradley Manning, Dan Handelman, Elections, Empire, Fascism, Global, Ronald Reagan, Saudi Arabia, U.S. Constitution, War. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s