Ninety per Cent of Success Is Just Showing Up

The appellant had red hair and was female. She showed up for the hearing, asking that the so-called Citizens Review Committee over-rule the so-called Independent Police Review board, on a cold day in January.

Put the Water on the Fire

Put the Water on the Fire

The Powers That Be (Your Intrepid reporter is perfectly willing to specify, by names, who is intended under this rubric; but let him stay out of jail a tad longer, why dont you) produced the legal equivalent of a deoxyribonucleic acid that was not acidic. That is, now having run out of options the System had to admit that this particular appellant was treated like an underthing, whose existence merely may be noted, but nothing else: the formation of the question resulting from the appellant’s complaint, through the three layers of what the United States Justice Department calls a “Byzantine, self-defeating” system, made no mention of anyone other than the ones arrested on the night of 24 November 2014. But the appellant — the woman who filed the complaint and appealed the decision that the Portland Police were within compliance, came in person before a board of fifteen strangers and asked the Citizens Review Committee to overturn that decision — was not arrested.

I see Dan Handelman’s report of it states as well that observers among the community members present were surprised by the outcome.  Here is the Oregonian’s report.



After three hours by my count (began 5:34 and lasted until 8:35) of discussion which made it quite evident how the course of this particular complaint was a veritable Poster Child for the lack of functioning of a complaint system: the appellant, who was not arrested, was advised that her complaint belonged in a group of complaints that were concerned with the ten people who were arrested, and ignored all of the Constitutional issues the arbitrary arrests raised about the lack of a freedom of assembly and the chance to present grievances in public. And then the System turned around and maintained that the appellant had no case since she had not been arrested.

In our Bizarro World imitation of a rational society, hers was the only complaint, out of 40 filed, that had lasted this far.

That is, the only complaint of the Police State treatment the demonstrators received that night, which the System would allow, was the complaint which the System had ignored from the beginning.

Any body with a basic sense of fair play could see there was an injustice here. The Citizens Review Committee, to my personal surprise, voted [5 yes, 3 no] to admonish the System and award the appellant the judgement that her appeal was “Sustained”. That is, that no reasonable person could conclude she had had her complaint aired.

About M. Meo

Worked as translator, museum technician, truck lumper, lecture demonstrator, teacher (of English as a Second Language, science, math). Married for 25 years, 2 boys aged 18 & 16 (both on the Grant cross-country team). A couple of scholarly publications in the history of science. Two years in federal penitentiary, 1970/71, for refusing the draft.
This entry was posted in Brian Willson, Cameron Whitten, Dan Handelman, Elections, Fascism, Free Speech, Friendship, John Schweibert, Local government, Pacific Green Party, Police, U.S. Constitution, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s